Maurice Buchbinder, MD,
from the Foundation for Cardiovascular Medicine
in La Jolla, Calif. presented that the Symbiot
Self-Expanding PTFE Covered Nitinol Stent (Boston
Scientific) failed to show a benefit compared
to bare-metal stenting in the reduction of distal
embolization and restenosis following saphenous
vein graft stenting.
The SYMBIOT-III trial was designed to show the
superiority of the Symbiot stent for the treatment
of saphenous vein graft disease over the use of
bare-metal stent controls, with a primary endpoint
a 10% reduction in diameter stenosis at eight-month
follow-up.
Patients who received the bare-metal stent had
slightly lower rates of major adverse cardiac
events and stent thrombosis that did not reach
statistical significance. Patients who received
the Symbiot stent achieved slightly better levels
of target vessel revascularization and target
lesion revascularization, but these differences
were not statistically significant.
There were minimal differences at eight-month
follow-up in reference vessel diameter and minimal
lumen diameter. Symbiot performed slightly better
in terms of acute gain, late loss and loss index.
In terms of the primary endpoint - in-stent diameter
stenosis at eight months - the Symbiot stent performed
slightly better. When expanding to the analysis
segment, the bare-metal stent achieved slightly
better outcomes. The Symbiot stent reduced in-stent
and analysis segment restenosis, but not by a
statistically significant margin. The addition
of the PTFE barrier also failed to reduce intimal
hyperplasia.
Inclusion criteria were liberal, which provided
for a high-risk population. Patients had up to
two de novo or restenotic lesions in a single
saphenous vein graft and up to two stents per
target lesion. Angiographic criteria called for
lesion length <41 mm, reference vessel diameter
>3.5 mm and <5.5 mm and total stent length
<51 mm.
In the trial, 400 patients were stratified to
receive GP IIb/IIIa antagonists and embolic protection,
and were then randomized to receive a bare-metal
stent or the Symbiot stent. Patients underwent
30-day clinical follow-up, eight-month angiographic
follow-up and 12-month clinical follow-up. The
patient population was notable only for the large
number of patients with diabetes (38% of control;
41% of Symbiot).
Figure 1: SYMBIOT III Results
| |
Bare
metal stent |
Symbiot |
P
Value |
| Major adverse cardiac events |
26.5% |
30.6% |
P=.43 |
| Stent thrombosis |
2.5% |
3.5% |
P=.16 |
| Target vessel revascularization (8-month) |
15.6% |
23.5% |
P=.055 |
| Target lesion revascularization (8-month) |
11.5% |
18.5% |
P=.065 |
| Reference vessel diameter (8-month) |
3.45mm |
3.44mm |
P=.90 |
| Minimal lumen diameter (8-month, in-stent) |
2.35mm |
2.39mm |
P=.75 |
| Acute gain |
2.06mm |
1.99mm |
P=.33 |
| Late loss |
0.94mm |
0.89mm |
P=.74 |
| Loss index |
0.50mm |
0.45mm |
P=.53 |
|