Search the news
Total: 208
article image

TCTAP 2024

Don't Forget About Dual Pathway Inhibition: When DOAC Should NOT Be Standard Treatment

Dominick J. Angiolillo University of Florida College of Medicine, USA Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, recently delivered a compelling lecture on the nuances and critical considerations surrounding dual pathway inhibition (DPI). The presentation started by introducing basic concepts of thrombosis formation (Figure 1). In case of an atherosclerotic plaque rupture, two key pathways are activated; the cellular pathway represented by platelets, as well as the plasma component represented by thrombin. The surface of the activated platelets is the main source for generation of thrombin, indicating an interplay between the two mechanisms. Despite efforts to block platelet activation, thrombosis continues to occur, leading to the concept of DPI of both platelets and coagulation. Figure 1. Mechanism of thrombus formation Ischemic events continue to occur even during aspirin monotherapy, and there have been some disappointments with the strategies of using alternative antiplatelet therapies. This led to a question of whether a very low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg bid) in adjunct to aspirin can reduce ischemic events, which was tested in the COMPASS trial (Figure 2). The landmark COMPASS trial examined nearly 30,000 patients to determine the efficacy of adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin therapy. Results from this trial indicated a significant decrease in ischemic events when using the combined DPI strategy versus aspirin alone, reshaping long-term secondary prevention tactics for patients with stable coronary and peripheral artery disease (CAD and PAD). Figure 2. Primary Endpoint of the COMPASS trial Despite these promising outcomes, the inherent risks associated with DPI were also addressed, which is an increased incidence of major bleeding events (Figure 3). This aspect remains a crucial consideration in clinical decision-making, emphasizing the need for careful patient selection based on individual risk profiles. Figure 3. Bleeding Outcomes from the COMPASS trial Studies on intensified antithrombotic therapy for long-term secondary prevention in patients with chronic coronary syndrome were highlighted (Figure 4), and the lecture concluded with a detailed algorithm to aid physicians in selecting the appropriate therapeutic strategy, considering factors such as high-risk features of both bleeding and ischemic events, including multivessel coronary disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, recurrent myocardial infarctions, and history of prior ischemic stroke (Figure 5). Figure 4. Studies on intensified antithrombotic therapy for long-term secondary prevention in CCS Figure 5. Algorithm for the choice of antithrombotic therapy in CCS patients Hot Topics All About New Data of Antithrombotics Friday, April 26, 4:40 PM ~ 6:06 PM Presentation Room 1, Level 1 Check The Session

June 19, 2024 1772

article image

TCTAP 2024

Bicuspid TAVR: All the Technical Issues and Data from Asan Medical Center

Jung-Min Ahn Asan Medical Center, Republic of Korea Jung-Min Ahn, MD (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea) presented a comprehensive overview of the technical challenges and clinical outcomes associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) from Asan Medical Center. Ahn highlighted the clinical and anatomical challenges of treating bicuspid AS with TAVR, emphasizing that clinical evidence is still limited. He referenced a large dataset of 12,000 patients, comparing outcomes between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve TAVR. The data showed no significant differences in hard endpoints, though bicuspid TAVR was associated with an increased risk of paravalvular leak (PVL) and aortic root injury. One key discussion point was comparing TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. While some studies showed no difference in mortality, others suggested numerically higher risk with SAVR, though this was not statistically significant (Figure 1). Device-specific outcomes were also discussed, noting that self-expandable devices had a higher risk of moderate or significant PVL, whereas balloon-expandable devices were associated with a higher risk of annulus rupture and aortic root injury. Figure 1. Comparison of TAVR and SAVR in bicuspid AS Ahn emphasized the importance of calcification in bicuspid valves. These valves often have a higher amount of calcium compared to tricuspid valves, which may lead to higher procedural risks. It was also pointed out that younger patients typically have a higher incidence of bicuspid AS, while it¡¯s not as common in older age groups. The presentation also included data on device sizing. Most bicuspid valves fall into tubular and flare types, which allow for device sizing based on annular size in 90% of cases. Ahn primarily focused on the Sapien 3 device, noting its effectiveness when sized correctly. He stressed the importance of avoiding oversizing in cases of severe calcification to reduce the risk of complications (Figure 2). Figure 2. Importance of avoiding oversizing in cases of severe calcification Ahn concluded that bicuspid AS has distinct clinical and phenotypical characteristics, such as younger patient age, more severe aortic valve calcification, and associated aortopathy. The incidence of paravalvular leak is higher compared to tricuspid aortic valve cohorts undergoing TAVR, and caution should be exercised regarding aortic injury. Despite these challenges, TAVR for bicuspid AS is not associated with an excess risk of mortality and stroke. Sapien 3 implantation in bicuspid aortic valves is comparable to its use in tricuspid valves. Therefore, there is a need to define specific criteria for selecting patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis who can be successfully treated with TAVR, much like the Echo-Score for rheumatic mitral stenosis. Hot Topics TAVR: Future Perspectives Saturday, April 27, 9:00 AM ~ 10:34 AM Valve & Endovascular Theater, Level 2 Check The Session

June 19, 2024 1748

article image

TCTAP 2024

The Series of FAME Studies: A Paradigm Shift in Our Thinking About Interventional Cardiology

William F. Fearon Stanford University, USA Coronary artery disease (CAD) management has significantly evolved over the past decade, largely due to the pivotal findings from the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) trials. The FAME 1, FAME 2, and FAME 3 studies collectively underscored the transformative role of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in optimizing treatment strategies for patients with CAD. Published in 2009, the FAME 1 trial, laid the groundwork for using FFR in guiding PCI. Traditionally, angiography has been the cornerstone for identifying significant coronary stenoses. However, the FAME 1 trial demonstrated that incorporating FFR measurements during PCI significantly improved patient outcomes. The study included 1,005 patients with multivessel CAD. It revealed that FFR-guided PCI, compared to angiography alone, resulted in a lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) over 1 year (13.2% vs. 18.3%, p=0.02). FAME 1 established that physiology-guided PCI simplifies the treatment process and enhances the prognostic outcomes for patients undergoing multivessel PCI. The FAME 2 trial, published in 2014, further validated the importance of FFR in patients with stable CAD. De Bruyne and colleagues conducted a study involving 1,220 patients, comparing outcomes between those who received FFR-guided PCI and those managed with medical therapy alone. The results showed patients in the FFR-guided PCI group had a significantly lower rate of the primary composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or urgent revascularization compared to the medical therapy group (4.3% vs. 12.7%, p

June 12, 2024 932

article image

TCTAP 2024

Calcified Nodules in Complex PCI: Are They All the Same and How Should We Treat?

Akiko Maehara Cardiovascular Research Foundation Akiko Maehara, MD (Columbia University, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, USA) started the lecture with a question, "What kind of calcified plaque should be treated?". The OCT study that was introduced enrolled 272 calcified nodules (CNs) in 230 patients who underwent pre- and post-optical coherence tomography (OCT). Nodules were divided into 2 groups, which were eruptive and non-eruptive CNs. In this study, the prevalence of CN was 5.9% per vessel and 7.3% per patient (Figure 1). Figure 1. OCT trial design Explosive Calcified Nodules (CNs): Predictors of Better Stent Expansion but Worse Post-PCI Outcomes Maehara stated that eruptive CNs are one of the predictors of better stent expansion because of the re-distribution mechanism of plaques. However, eruptive CNs showed a worse post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcome in terms of target lesion failure (TLF) compared to non-eruptive CNs (Figure 2). Factors associated with 2-year TLF included eruptive CNs, the circumference of the CN, angle in lesions, and the stent area. The lecture concluded with the following messages, 1) Stent implantation deformed an eruptive CN more than a noneruptive CN 2) Non-eruptive CN, greater CN, greater surrounding calcium, and negative remodeling were associated with poor stent expansion 3) TLR increased at 6 months post-PCI in the eruptive CN group more than non-eruptive CN group 4) An eruptive CN, greater CN, greater hinge motion, and small stent area were associated with a worse 2-year TLF Figure 2. Outcomes pre- and post-PCI in eruptive and non-eruptive CNs Hot Topics All About Tips & Tricks for Complex PCI Saturday, April 27, 9:30 AM ~ 11:10 AM Main Arena, Level 2 Check The Session

June 12, 2024 841

article image

TCTAP 2024

New Launched M-TEER Device for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: PASCAL Experiences in Japan

Shinichi Shirai Kokura Memorial Hospital, Japan Shinichi Shirai, MD (Kokura Memorial Hospital, Japan) highlighted the advancements and clinical experiences with the PASCAL device for treating degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) in Japan. Shirai detailed the procedure using a case study of a 79-year-old woman with severe MR due to P2 prolapse. Despite her complex medical history, the team opted for the M-TEER procedure using the PASCAL system (Figure 1). Pre-procedure echocardiography showed significant regurgitation with an effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) of 0.76 cm©÷. Figure 1. Final results of M-TEER procedure using the PASCAL system Advantages of the PASCAL system: Ergonomic Design and Ease of Use The ergonomic handle and ease of manipulation were highlighted, making the procedure smoother and potentially reducing the learning curve. Shirai emphasized the system's guide sheath, which easily penetrated the septal portion, facilitating straightforward atrial navigation. PASCAL Clips: Tailored Solutions for Varied Anatomical Needs The PASCAL system offers two types of clips: PASCAL Ace and PASCAL, catering to different anatomical needs. The ergonomic design and streamlined structure make it user-friendly and effective in reducing left atrial pressure post-procedure, with no residual mitral stenosis and improved pulmonary vein flow. Early Clinical Experiences and Future Prospects of the PASCAL System in JAPAN Shirai concluded the lecture by underscoring the numerous benefits of the PASCAL system, based on their initial experiences in Japan (Figure 2). Due to its seamless structure, the guide sheath was particularly effective in accessing and penetrating the septum. The PASCAL system's ergonomic handle allowed for precise manipulation during the procedure, which is crucial for successful outcomes. Although structural differences exist compared to preceding products, familiarity with treatment techniques may contribute to a faster learning curve for practitioners. Compared to the previous devices, the PASCAL system showed less mitral valve area loss due to its spacer, and the width of the paddle could potentially reduce the number of devices needed per procedure. Overall, the PASCAL system represents a significant advancement in the treatment of degenerative MR, offering enhanced patient outcomes and a promising future for mitral valve interventions in Japan and beyond. Figure 2. Conclusion from the Japanese experiences of using the PASCAL device Hot Topics Evolution of Mitral and Tricuspid Interventions Saturday, April 27, 10:40 AM ~ 11:52 AM Valve & Endovascular Theater, Level 2 Check The Session

June 12, 2024 662

article image

TCTAP 2024

Following BEST-CLI and BASIL-2: How to ¡°Best¡± Serve Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia?

Lawrence A. Garcia St. Francis Hospital Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), a condition of arterial insufficiency of the lower limb with ischemic foot pain at rest, a nonhealing ischemic ulcer, or gangrene, is the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease, and its optimal initial treatment—whether it¡¯s surgical or endovascular revascularization—remains a topic of debate. At TCTAP 2024, Lawrence A. Garcia, MD (St. Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, NY, USA) provided insights into this issue by analyzing details from two landmark trials, BEST-CLI and BASIL-2 (Figure 1). Published a year ago at around the same time, these studies presented contradictory conclusions about patients with CLTI, thus causing considerable debate. Figure 1. BEST-CLI vs. BASIL-2 Trial designs The BEST-CLI study was a randomized superiority trial that enrolled 1,847 patients across 150 sites in the USA, Canada, Finland, Italy, and New Zealand. It consisted of two cohorts: cohort 1 included 1,434 patients with suitable venous conduits for bypass (718 undergoing surgical revascularization and 716 receiving endovascular treatment), and cohort 2 included 396 patients requiring alternative conduits (197 undergoing surgical revascularization and 199 receiving endovascular treatment). In cohort 1, the median time to the index procedure was 4 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1-11 days) for the surgical group and 1 day (IQR, 0-7 days) for the endovascular group. In the surgical group, 85% of the procedures utilized a single segment of the great saphenous vein, achieving a technical success rate of 98%, compared to 85% in the endovascular group. In cohort 2, the median time to the index procedure was 4 days (IQR, 1-13 days) for the surgical group and 1 day (IQR, 0-7 days) for the endovascular group, with technical success rates of 100% and 80.6%, respectively. During a median follow-up of 2.7 years in cohort 1, 42.6% of the surgical group and 57.4% of the endovascular group experienced the primary outcome of major adverse limb events (MALE) or death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.79; p< .001). The surgical group also had fewer major reinterventions and above-ankle amputations than the endovascular group (9.2% and 10.4% vs. 23.5% and 14.9%, respectively). In the BASIL-2 study, patients with CLTI requiring infrapopliteal revascularization who received the best endovascular treatment had better amputation-free survival (AFS) than those who received surgical vein bypass. Conducted across 41 hospital-based vascular surgery units in the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Denmark, the study had no exclusions for vein or bypass suitability and involved 345 patients. Major amputation or death occurred in 63% of patients (108 out of 172) in the vein bypass group versus 53% (92 out of 173) in the best endovascular treatment group (adjusted HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.80; p = .037). The median AFS was 3.3 years (IQR, 2.1-4.3 years) in the vein bypass group and 4.4 years (IQR, 3.4-5.9 years) in the best endovascular treatment group. Death from any cause occurred in 53% of the vein bypass group and 45% of the best endovascular treatment group (adjusted HR for overall survival, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.00-1.87). Major amputation occurred in 20% of the vein bypass group and 18% of the best endovascular treatment group (adjusted HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.75-2.01). ¡°There are difficulties in conducting a trial involving the below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. Apart from the outcomes for the above-the-knee studies, which seem dependent upon patency and walking difficulties, the BTK data are mired in endpoints, heterogeneity of subjects, non-uniform nature of wound care, and type of patients enrolled.¡± Garcia emphasized at the beginning of his lecture that these characteristics have been observed in endovascular studies involving BTK vessels, such as the IN.PACT DEEP, LEVENT, and SAVAL trials. Emphasizing the features of the trials, Garcia mentioned that in the BEST-CLI study, only 18% of the enrollees were non-surgeons in the endovascular group, there was no interventional monitoring committee for those who did the intervention, and of the patients enrolled in the endovascular group, there was a 38% crossover that has never been defined. The primary endpoint was the composite of death and MALE. Of note, one component of MALE was a ¡®major¡¯ reintervention, which did not include restenosis. Reintervention need and timing were determined by the site investigator, and there were no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization criteria or independent adjudication. In BASIL 2, the MALE endpoints were similar in both treatment sides. Still, revision or primary procedural repeat as failure was assessed as an outcome, and any restenosis was considered a failure in the endovascular group. The primary endpoint was AFS or all-cause death. Of note, only mortality drove the difference between cohorts. Garcia¡¯s key message was that unfortunately, difficulties with patients, wounds, and endpoints have allowed no one trial to be successful and acceptable. ¡°In a given trial, patients need to be very specific and unless they are, the results will not answer the question for the cohort we see every day with CLTI. Unfortunately, that must be our first step. In this environment, the two trials are remarkable studies that, unfortunately, missed their mark for the question asked.¡± Garcia concluded. Hot Topics EVAR, TEVAR and Peripheral Interventions Saturday, April 27, 2:00 PM ~ 3:18 PM Valve & Endovascular Theater, Level 2 Check The Session

June 12, 2024 641

article image

TCTAP 2024

AI Application of Cardiovascular Imaging

Jihoon Kweon Asan Medical Center, Republic of Korea A recent lecture at TCTAP 2024 introduced a new database for developing cardiovascular imaging artificial intelligence (AI), integrating AI models for post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) evaluation, and application of general AI. Jihoon Kweon, PhD (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea) has developed AI-QCA, which provides reproducible and reliable real-time coronary angiography analysis. To achieve this, data from 10,000 patients were used to train the AI, minimizing exclusions better to reflect the characteristics of the real patient pool. However, the challenge of expanding the database size to develop a more robust AI model remained. To address this, he built a large-scale database (Asan Invasive Coronary Angiography Network, A-ICAnet) containing 3 million angiographic frames, with plans to increase this to 100 million images (Figure 1). He demonstrated that by using A-ICAnet, segmentation of target vessels could be improved by more than 2% on average. He also suggested that A-ICAnet could be used for segmenting lumens in other views or with different interventional devices. Figure 1. A large-scale coronary angiography database for AI development AI integration was then introduced to post-PCI stent evaluation. Although stent expansion can be evaluated by specifying the proximal and distal ends of the implanted stent using AI-QCA, eliminating manual operations will help incorporate post-PCI stent evaluation into clinical practice. He developed an AI model for stent segmentation in fluoroscopy to automatically set the reference points for post-PCI stent evaluation. Over 1,000 images were collected at Asan Medical Center and used for AI training. Using an ensemble of three segmentation models, the AI achieved an F1 score of over 88%. By mapping the stent area onto the angiography, the proximal and distal ends of the stent area could be determined accurately (Figure 2). Post-PCI evaluation using AI-QCA was completed within one second without additional image acquisition. In the representative case, the AI model accurately set the stent area for assessment and identified an under-expansion that would likely be difficult to estimate visually. Figure 2. AI-AI integration for post-PCI stent evaluation Lastly, he demonstrated the potential of general AI for cardiovascular imaging. Meta has developed an AI model called the Segment Anything Model (SAM), which segments each area based on user input. With SAM, a catheter or guidewire could be automatically segmented with just one click (Figure 3). Although this task previously required advanced image processing methods, it now requires a single AI model without labeling, training, or tuning. Meta's Co-tracker was developed to track the path at a given location. By locating the stent area in fluoroscopy, the Co-tracker could continue to track movement even after the lumen area was filled with contrast. He claimed that while these technologies are not yet sufficient to analyze all cardiovascular imaging, AI advancements are expected to change the clinical environment in the near future. Figure 3. Application of general AI for segmentation of fluoroscopy Hot Topics MedTech Innovation Friday, April 26, 2:00 PM ~ 3:08 PM Presentation Room 1, Level 1 Check The Session

June 04, 2024 773

article image

TCTAP 2024

Severe AS with Low Valve Calcium Score: Different Prognosis?

Yeonwoo Choi Chnagwon Hanmaeum, Republic of Korea Yeonwoo Choi, MD (Hanyang University, Changwon Hanmaeum Hospital, Changwon, Korea) explored severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) with low aortic valve calcification (AVC) score and its different prognosis at TCTAP 2024 on April 27. He stressed that patients with low AVC exhibit distinct clinical characteristics and a higher risk of long-term mortality compared with those with high AVC. Degenerative AS is characterized by excessive valvular calcification, which is also implicated in the hemodynamic progression of AS. Due to the possibility of discordance in echo parameters, AVC score was proposed as a diagnostic algorithm. Approximately 20% of the patients with discordant echo parameters had AVC scores below threshold (Figure 1). Figure 1. Threshold identifying severe aortic stenosis To analyze the prognosis and characteristics of severe AS with low AVC, a total of 1,002 patients were enrolled from the ASAN-AVR registry, a prospective, single-center, real-world registry including all consecutive patients who had undergone surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. 1 in 4 patients with severe degenerative AS had an AVC lower than the proposed threshold for the diagnosis of severe AS. Those with low AVC were more likely to be female, receive hemodialysis, be younger, and had less LV remodeling. During a median follow-up period of 3.8 years, patients with low AVC had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (Figure 2, 3). Figure 2. Clinical outcomes of patients with low and high AVC from the ASAN-AVR registry Figure 3. Hazard ratio of all-cause mortality and MACE by AVC quartiles Choi pointed out that women had a larger fibrotic component and a smaller calcification component compared to men, and these non-calcified tissues or fibrosis may be the cause of development and progression of AS, considering that several studies on aortic valve tissue volume and composition showed that non-calcific tissue volume was associated with cardiovascular events after TAVR. Meanwhile, there may be other pathophysiological mechanisms in the development and progression of AS that are not fully explained by calcification (Figure 4). Choi concluded that approximately 1 in 4 patients with severe AS have low AVC and these patients are at a higher risk of long-term mortality. Further research is needed to understand the pathogenesis and progression of low AVC AS. Figure 4. Characteristics and prognosis of patients with low AVC and high AVC Clinical Science All About New Data from Asan Medical Center Saturday, April 27, 10:05 AM ~ 11:25 AM Presentation Room 1, Level 1 Check The Session

June 04, 2024 750

article image

TCTAP 2024

Impact of Intravascular Imaging-guided PCI or CABG in Multi-Vessel Disease: The BEST Extended Follow...

Jinho Lee Kyung Hee University Hospital, Republic of Korea A recent post-hoc analysis of the BEST extended follow-up study shed new light on the efficacy of intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) compared to bypass surgery for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Previous research (IVUS-XPL, ULTIMATE, and RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trials) has shown that intravascular imaging-guided PCI improves clinical outcomes compared to coronary angiography (CAG)-guided PCI for cases of complex CAD. While both the American and European guidelines recommend IVUS-guided PCI as a class IIa intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the preferred option for patients with multivessel CAD, due to its perceived survival advantage. To address the question of whether the improved outcomes associated with IVUS-guided PCI could challenge the status of CABG in multivessel CAD, the researchers conducted an analysis of patient data from the BEST extended trial. This prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial enrolled a total of 880 patients with multivessel disease over a 5-year period, randomly assigning them to either PCI with EESs or CABG. The median follow-up period was 11.8 years. The total patient population was categorized according to their treatment modalities into 3 groups: IVUS-guided PCI, CAG-guided PCI, and CABG (Figure 1). The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization. Figure 1. Study design of the sub-study of BEST extended trial Notably, the CABG group had a higher rate of three-vessel disease, while the IVUS-guided PCI group had a higher incidence of two-vessel disease. Procedural characteristics varied across the groups, with complete revascularization more frequently achieved in the CABG group. However, the IVUS-guided PCI group had a longer total stent length and a larger stent diameter compared to the angiography-guided PCI group. Analyses of the primary composite endpoint and other key outcomes revealed that the IVUS-guided PCI group and the CABG group had similar event rates, both lower than the angiography-guided PCI group (Figure 2). Multivariable analysis adjusted for baseline imbalances confirmed these findings, indicating that IVUS-guided PCI is a safe and effective alternative to CABG for patients with multivessel disease. In conclusion, the study advocates a routine use of intravascular imaging during PCI for multivessel CAD, suggesting that IVUS-guided PCI offers comparable outcomes to CABG. Figure 2. Primary composite endpoint of the sub-study of BEST extended trial Clinical Science All About New Data from Asan Medical Center Saturday, April 27, 10:05 AM ~ 11:25 AM Presentation Room 1, Level 1 Check The Session

June 04, 2024 684

article image

TCTAP 2024

Rule of 5-6-7-8 for Bifurcation PCI: It Is Time to Change in 2024

Jung-Min Ahn Asan Medical Center, Republic of Korea At TCTAP 2024, Jung-Min Ahn, MD (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea) presented compelling new criteria for optimizing left main (LM) coronary artery stenting. Traditionally, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance has been recommended to enhance clinical outcomes in LM procedures, highlighted by the well-known "5-6-7-8" criteria developed at Asan Medical Center. This standard, primarily predictive of angiographic restenosis, has been a benchmark in the field. A recent study scrutinizes the adequacy of these existing recommendations, focusing on the relationship between stent expansion in LM bifurcation and long-term clinical outcomes. Ahn conducted a comprehensive analysis of 292 patients who underwent LM two-stenting with crush technique. The study identified the minimal stent area (MSA) at various segments within the LM bifurcation—11.8 mm©÷ at the distal LM, 8.3 mm©÷ at the ostial left anterior descending (LAD), and 5.7 mm©÷ at the ostial circumflex—which are crucial for predicting clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The findings compellingly suggest that while the distal LM's MSA did not significantly predict clinical outcomes, the MSA at the ostia of LAD and circumflex independently predicted outcomes, marking them as critical areas for ensuring adequate stent expansion. Those in the under-expansion group exhibited notably poorer outcomes, further emphasizing the need for precise stent placement and expansion. In another research, conducted on a large cohort of 879 patients at Asan Medical Center from March 2005 to September 2022, sought to validate the efficacy of IVUS in patients who underwent LM single-stent with crossover. The study identified the MSA from LM to LAD—11.4 mm©÷ at the proximal LM, 8.3 mm©÷ at the distal LM, and 8.1 mm©÷ at the ostial LAD. Importantly, these two studies propose a shift from the "5-6-7-8" to a "6-8-11" criteria, which better correlates with the observed clinical outcomes in LM PCI (Figure 1). Figure 1. New IVUS MSA for LM bifurcation stenting Ahn¡¯s findings highlighted the importance of ensuring maximal MSA, as stent under-expansion was significantly associated with adverse long-term outcomes. The new criteria aim to establish more rigorous standards to ensure better clinical outcomes. The presentation concluded with a strong endorsement of intracoronary imaging as a pivotal tool for optimizing stent placement. It was emphasized that while imaging itself does not directly correlate with better outcomes, strategic use of this technology to guide stent placement contributes significantly to improved patient and stent outcomes. This session not only provided invaluable insights into the technical aspects of LM PCI but also reinforced the importance of ongoing research and adaptation of techniques in the interventional cardiology field. TCTAP Workshops New Concept of Bifurcation PCI Thursday, April 25, 4:00 PM ~ 5:40 PM Valve & Endovascular Theater, Level 2 Check The Session

May 30, 2024 860

Advertisement