Search the news
Total: 217
article image

TCTAP 2024

Moderate AS in HFrEF: Time to Treat is Now & Future Expectation from RCT

Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) have a high mortality risk across all levels of AS severity. Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, MD (Erasmus University Medical Center, Netherlands), commented that any degree of AS is clinically relevant, and emphasized the role of cardiac remodeling, fibrosis, and dysfunction in the natural history of patients with AS, which yields high residual risk after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Currently, AVR is only formally indicated for symptomatic, severe AS. However, optimal timing of intervention in patients with moderate AS remains controversial. He mentioned that patients with concomitant moderate AS and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction are also at high risk for clinical events such as death, AVR, or heart failure (HF) hospitalization, raising questions whether earlier AVR in these patients could improve clinical outcomes. Several studies have shown that patients with moderate AS and LV dysfunction are associated with a poor prognosis, as are patients with symptomatic AS. Transcatheter AVR (TAVR) can provide mechanical LV unloading in patients with HF and moderate AS. Based on the multinational ATLAS TAVI registry, patients with non-severe AS and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction had better survival with TAVR than with medical treatment. These results suggest the need for randomized controlled trials comparing TAVR versus medical treatment in patients with moderate AS and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Meanwhile, risk stratification approaches considering the presence of extra-aortic cardiac damage (i.e., LV, left atrial or mitral valve damage, pulmonary or tricuspid valve damage, right ventricular damage or subclinical HF) have also been studied, which may be helpful to identify asymptomatic AS patients who may benefit from elective AVR. Several clinical trials are currently underway to answer the question of whether early AVR for moderate AS in the setting of HFrEF interrupts maladaptive cardiac remodeling and improves clinical outcomes. Among them, the results of TAVR UNLOAD trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02661451) are expected in 2024 (Figure 1). The PROGRESS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04889872) and the Evolut¢â EXPAND TAVR II pivotal trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05149755) will also provide valuable insights on the moderate AS population. Figure 1. Pathophysiologic rationale for the TAVR UNLOAD trial Meet the Experts Over Breakfast TAVR: Techniques and Issues Friday, April 26, 7:30 AM ~ 8:25 AM Presentation Room 1, Level 1 Check The Session

May 30, 2024 676

article image

TCTAP 2024

How Can We Further Improve Reperfusion in AMI?: Revising or Novel Approach

In a captivating presentation at TCTAP 2024 in Incheon, Korea, Adrian P. Banning, MD (Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom), illuminated the current landscape of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction (MI), with a particular focus on the outcomes of intermittent coronary sinus occlusion. Despite technological strides enhancing the efficacy of reperfusion therapy post-acute MI, outcomes have been stagnant since the early 2000s. Cardiologists worldwide acknowledge their unwavering dedication to patient care yet recognize the persistent need for improved clinical outcomes in acute MI cases. Countless clinical trials have endeavored to evaluate novel devices and approaches to better prognoses, yet many have failed due to inefficacy. While the current standard treatments yield favorable results in approximately 60-70% of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, the crux lies in individualized care. Each patient presents with unique comorbidities and socioeconomic factors, necessitating tailored approaches within the framework of standard management protocols. The size of the infarct is a pivotal determinant of clinical outcomes post-acute MI. Extensive research underscores a direct correlation between larger infarct sizes and worsened clinical prognoses. Meta-analyses have elucidated this relationship, showing mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization rates escalating alongside increasing infarct sizes. Various validated tools have emerged to refine outcome prognostication. Microvascular occlusion, detected via cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), stands out as a robust predictor of mortality and HF hospitalization within one year. Additionally, the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) has emerged as an early discriminator, with post-PCI IMR values exceeding 40 signaling adverse outcomes in the catheterization laboratory. Recent advancements, such as angiography-derived IMR, leveraging computational flow dynamics for 3D vessel modeling, exhibit a promising correlation with wire-based IMR measurements. In light of these advancements, he unveiled findings from the pressure-controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PiCSO)-AMI-I trial, evaluating the clinical efficacy of intermittent coronary sinus occlusion. Enrolling 145 STEMI patients, the trial randomized participants to conventional PCI or PiCSO-assisted PCI. Disappointingly, the primary endpoint of infarct size at 5 days by CMR failed to exhibit significant differences between groups despite prolonged PCI durations and increased radiation and radiocontrast exposure (Figure 1). Similarly, clinical outcomes remained unaltered. Figure 1. Result of the primary endpoint of PiCSO-AMI-I trial As pursuing enhanced outcomes in acute MI treatment persists, these findings underscore the necessity for continued exploration and innovation within reperfusion therapy paradigms. Meet the Experts Over Breakfast ACS and Acute MI: Brand New Issues Saturday, April 27, 7:30 AM ~ 8:25 AM Presentation Room 2, Level 1 Check The Session

May 30, 2024 698

article image

TCTAP 2024

Revascularization for Left Main Disease: Updated Data, Global Guideline and Beyond

During a recent lecture at Asan Medical Center, Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD (Asan Medical Center, Korea), shared critical updates on revascularization for left main (LM) coronary artery disease, incorporating global guidelines and innovations beyond traditional methods. His discussion, based on significant clinical research and trials such as SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, NOBLE, and EXCEL, focused on the relative merits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). He presented findings from a meta-analysis of 4,394 patients, which indicated that over a decade, there was no notable difference in all-cause mortality between PCI and CABG arms. These results highlight the intricate decision-making process in selecting the appropriate revascularization strategy, influenced by the coronary complexity assessed by the SYNTAX score (Figure 1). Figure 1. Candidates for PCI in those with left main disease, based on the 2018 ESC guideline. The lecture also delved into the significance of physiological and imaging techniques in enhancing PCI outcomes. He stressed the importance of tools such as fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound, which are essential for a more accurate clinical assessment and revealing the functional severity of coronary lesions that angiography might overlook. In discussing technological advancements, evolving PCI methods were mentioned, including dual stenting for complex bifurcation lesions, which showed promise in keeping vessels open and reducing restenosis. Such advancements are indicative of a shift towards more precise and individualized approaches in managing LM disease, aligning with the principles of personalized medicine. Furthermore, he emphasized the need for tailored revascularization strategies that consider each patient's unique anatomical and comorbidity profiles to maximize treatment outcomes. This approach underscores a substantial shift in the treatment paradigm for LM coronary artery disease, moving away from traditional surgical methods. The concluding message, "LM Disease is Not a Surgical Disease Anymore!" indicates a significant turning point in the field. The progress in imaging and physiology-guided PCI has greatly enhanced clinical outcomes, proving that non-surgical methods are not only feasible but also highly effective. Particularly, the strategy of deploying upfront dual stents in cases of true bifurcation has been shown to be both safe and beneficial. This approach reflects the ongoing refinement in interventional cardiology, where precise, tailored treatments enhance patient recovery and long-term health, steering away from more invasive surgical options. TCTAP Workshops Left Main and Multi-Vessel Diseases: Updated Concept and Treatment Thursday, April 25, 2:00 PM ~ 3:50 PM Valve & Endovascular Theater, Level 2 Check The Session

May 21, 2024 976

article image

TCTAP 2024

Choosing Wisely: FFR vs. Anatomy-guided Left Main PCI -The Rationale of the FATE-MAIN Trial

A recent lecture by Do-Yoon Kang, MD, PhD (Asan Medical Center, Korea), at TCTAP 2024, ¡®Left Main and Multi-Vessel Diseases: Updated Concept and Treatment¡¯ elucidated the evolving landscape of diagnosing and treating significant stenosis in Left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. The definition of a significant left main disease varies, with thresholds set by major trials, such as the PRECOMBAT and EXCEL trials (Figure 1). While the PRECOMBAT trial identified significant disease at a threshold of 50% in terms of diameter stenosis, as estimated visually, the EXCEL trial defined significant stenosis as 70%, incorporating functional assessments for diameter stenosis between 50% and 70%. Some past trials have shown surgical benefits for patients with left main disease with a diameter stenosis of over 50% or 70%. However, challenges persist due to the poor reproducibility of angiographic analysis in assessing LMCA stenosis. In turn, intracoronary imaging combined with fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been offered as a solution, with data supporting its use in equivocal cases. Also, the 2018 ESC guideline recommends considering intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to assess the severity of unprotected left main lesions. Meanwhile, discrepancies remain in FFR and IVUS-minimal luminal area (MLA) in intermediate LMCA stenosis. Figure 1. Definition of Significant Left Main Disease In this clinical context, the upcoming FATE-MAIN (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Treatment-Decision and Evaluation of Significant Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) trial was announced, comparing outcomes of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) against angiography-guided interventions (Figure 2). The study aims to enroll 934 patients, and the primary endpoint will be the composite of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or repeat revascularization at 2 years. The lecture concluded with a message that achieving complete functional revascularization is important, and for all borderline or intermediate LMCA disease it is strongly recommended to confirm physiologic lesion significance before treatment using FFR evaluation. It is anticipated that FATE-MAIN will show better patient outcomes with FFR-guided PCI by avoiding unnecessary interventions. Figure 2. Study Design of the FATE-MAIN Trial TCTAP Workshops Left Main and Multi-Vessel Diseases: Updated Concept and Treatment Thursday, April 25, 2:00 PM ~ 3:50 PM Valve & Endovascular Theater, Level 2 Check The Session

May 21, 2024 831

article image

TCTAP 2024

Implications of the ISCHEMIA Trial on Patient Selection for CTO-PCI

At TCTAP 2024 in Incheon, Korea, Sripal Bangalore, MD (New York University Grossman School of Medicine, USA), delved into the implications of the ISCHEMIA Trial on patient selection for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI). Historically, three major CTO trials, EXPLORE, EURO-CTO, and DECISION-CTO, have compared invasive and conservative treatments. Each of these trials failed to demonstrate a significant benefit in clinical outcomes, including death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 5 years. He presented the results of the landmark ISCHEMIA Trial, which randomized 5,179 patients with stable angina and significant MI to either conservative or invasive treatment. Primary and secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between the two groups. Although mortality rates were similar, the invasive treatment arm exhibited reduced incidences of spontaneous MI, unstable angina, and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations. Additionally, symptomatic patients experienced faster and more sustained relief from angina with invasive treatment. To address the question regarding the role of PCI in CTO management, he introduced the ISCHEMIA Trial CTO sub-study. This sub-study included 1,470 CTO patients identified via coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and compared them with non-CTO counterparts. CTO patients tended to be younger with a higher prevalence of prior MI and heart failure, as well as moderate to severe ischemia on stress imaging. Clinical outcomes revealed inferior results for CTO patients, with higher rates of primary endpoints and cardiovascular mortality. Moreover, a comparison of conservative and invasive treatments within CTO or non-CTO groups yielded similar primary endpoint outcomes, with lower incidences of spontaneous MI observed in the invasive treatment arms, mirroring the overall ISCHEMIA trial findings (Figure 1). Figure 1. Outcomes by treatment group and CTO status in ISCHEMIA Trial CTO sub-study Concluding the lecture, he underscored the importance of treatment strategies for CTO patients. Drawing insights from all CTO trials and the ISCHEMIA CTO sub-study, the implementation of aggressive guideline-directed medical therapy was advocated for all CTO patients. Furthermore, judicious consideration of invasive treatment was suggested to enhance angina-related quality of life and mitigate the risk of spontaneous MI. TCTAP Workshops CTO-PCI: To Treat, or Not To Treat Thursday, April 25, 10:30 AM ~ 12:22 PM Valve & Endovascular Theater, Level 2 Check The Session

May 21, 2024 776

article image

TCTAP 2024

ASSURE-DES Trial: Optimal Antiplatelet Strategy in DES Patients During Noncardiac Surgery

Hanbit Park, MD GangNeung Asan Hospital, Korea The management of antiplatelet therapy in patients who need noncardiac surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) requires consideration, including the risks of stent thrombosis with cessation and bleeding with continuation. The current guideline recommends continuation of aspirin perioperatively if the bleeding risk allows. However, for patients undergoing surgery with high bleeding risk (e.g. intracranial, spinal neurosurgery, or vitreoretinal ophthalmic surgery), discontinuation of aspirin is recommended at least 7 days preoperatively. There are limited data on continuation of aspirin in patients with prior PCI with DES who are undergoing noncardiac surgery. The subgroup analysis of POISE-2 trial showed that in patients with prior PCI, continuation of aspirin reduced the risk of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.95). The risk for major or life-threatening bleeding was neutral (HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.55-2.88). However, this study was underpowered and does not exclude a potential subgroup effect, as it was a subgroup analysis. Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Drug-eluting Stent Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery (ASSURE-DES) trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of aspirin cessation or continuation in perioperative period of noncardiac surgery in patients who have undergone PCI with DES for more than 12 months (Figure 1). Key exclusion criteria includes recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (within 1 month), severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF ¡Â 30%), severe valvular heart disease, emergent operation, or high bleeding risk operation (e.g., intracranial, intraspinal, or retinal surgery). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stent thrombosis, MI and stroke from 5 days before to 30 days after surgery. From March 2017 through to March 2024, a total of 900 patients were enrolled. The primary results will become available this year, which is anticipated to provide valuable clinical evidence to determine optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients who underwent PCI with DES before noncardiac surgery. Figure 1. The study design of the ASSURE DES trial Clinical Science Ongoing Trials from Asan Medical Center Saturday, April 27, 11:30 AM ~ 12:40 PM Presentation Room 1, Level 1 Check The Session

April 25, 2024 1444

article image

TCTAP 2024

OCTIVUS Trial: OCT- vs. IVUS-guided PCI in All-comer PCI

On April 27th, the primary results of comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided versus intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) will be presented by Do-Yoon Kang, MD, PhD (Asan Medical Center, Korea), based on the insights from the Optical Coherence Tomography versus Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OCTIVUS) trial. The OCTIVUS trial was conducted by Duk-Woo Park MD, PhD et al., from 2018 to 2022, where 3897 and 2008 patients were screened and randomized, respectively. The results were reported at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) congress in 2023 and published in Circulation. To date, imaging-guided PCI has shown superior clinical outcomes compared to angiography-guided PCI. Therefore, it is recommended that IVUS or OCT be considered in selected patients to optimize stent implantation with a IIa level of evidence. However, controversies remain on the clinical efficacy and safety between OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI. Hence, the OCTIVUS trial was conducted to evaluate this issue. The design of the pragmatic OCTIVUS Trial will be introduced in the session (Figure 1). It attempted to incorporate clinically relevant tools of usual intracoronary imaging in the routine PCI practice, a diverse study population with various clinical and anatomical characteristics, heterogeneous PCI management practice settings, use of a broad range of clinical endpoints, and lastly, clinically unmet issues in the daily clinical practice. Figure 1. OCTIVUS trial design The primary endpoint of the trial was target vessel failure (TVF) at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint, target-lesion failure, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, contrast-induced nephropathy and procedural complications. Patient flow and follow-up scheme is provided in the figure below (Figure 2). Figure 2. Patient flow and follow-up scheme In the presentation, the results of the study will be shared, including key baseline characteristics, as well as anatomical and procedural characteristics, which successfully reflected a real-world clinical practice in a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) setting. Procedural outcomes and core lab-imaging analysis will also be provided to further the understanding of the results of the study. 53.4% and 60.1% of treated lesions met all stent-optimization criteria in the OCT-guided PCI group and IVUS-guided PCI group, respectively (p=0.001). At 1 year after randomization, the primary endpoint, a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization, had occurred in 25 of 1005 patients (2.5%) in the OCT-guided PCI group and in 31 of 1003 patients (3.1%) in the IVUS-guided PCI group (risk difference, −0.6 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.97; P

April 25, 2024 1077

article image

TCTAP 2024

PREVENT trial: Confirmative RCT of Preventive PCI for Vulnerable Plaques

PREVENT Supports Early PCI for Vulnerable Plaques, with Reductions in MACE Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD Asan Medical Center, Korea At TCTAP 2024, a landmark study is to be presented, which was also published in The Lancet, providing compelling evidence supporting the efficacy of prophylactic percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat vulnerable plaques on top of optimal medical therapy (OMT) in reducing the incidence of serious cardiovascular (CV) events over a 2-year period. The findings support expanding PCI indications to encompass non-flow-limiting, high-risk vulnerable plaques, and will support a paradigm shift in the management of CV disease. Key Insights from the PREVENT Trial Preventive PCI or Medical Therapy Alone for Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaque (PREVENT) enrolled 1,606 patients at 15 centers in 4 countries who had non-flow-limiting vulnerable coronary plaques of > 50% stenosis and a negative fractional flow reserve (FFR) of > 0.80. The mean age of the patients was 64 years, and 27% were women. Vulnerable plaques were defined as lesions possessing at least two of these characteristics: a minimal lumen area (MLA) of less than 4¡¤0 mm©÷, a plaque burden of more than 70%, a lipid-rich plaque by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) (defined as maximum lipid core burden index within any 4 mm pullback length [maxLCBI4mm] >315), or a thin-cap fibroatheroma detected by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasonography (RF-IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Figure 1). Ultimately, 95% of patients in the trial were assessed by grayscale intravascular imaging, not newer, more sensitive imaging modalities. Figure 1. The PREVENT study design Patients were randomly assigned to PCI plus OMT or OMT alone. Although the trial was initially designed to use bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, with their removal from the market, permanent metallic everolimus-eluting stents were used instead. As a result, in the PCI group, drug-eluting stents (DESs) were used in 67% and bioresorbable scaffold in 33%. Intravascular imaging was used in all cases to optimize stent or scaffold implantation. More than 50% of patients in both groups were on high- or moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe during the follow-up period. The mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol level in both groups was 64 mg/dL at last follow-up, down from a median of 83 mg/dL at baseline in the preventive PCI group and 93 mg/dL in the OMT group. In the trial, patients randomized to the preventive PCI group had an 89% lower risk of the composite primary endpoint of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina at 2 years compared with those in the OMT group (0.4% vs. 3.4%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.36) (Figure 2). Figure 2. Primary composite outcome The number-needed-to-treat (NNT) to prevent one primary outcome event over 2 years in the preventive PCI group was 45.4, with a NNT of 87.7 to prevent one cardiac death or target-vessel MI. Reduction in CV events sustained up to 7 years Over the long-term follow-up, the primary outcome occurred less frequently in the preventive PCI group than in the medical therapy alone group (6.5% vs 9.4%; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.33-0.87) (Figure 3). The absolute difference of 3% in the primary composite endpoint was sustained through 7 years of follow-up, with a median of 4.4 years. This study underscores the enduring impact of early intervention strategies in reducing adverse CV events associated with vulnerable plaques. Figure 3. Primary composite outcome at 7 year follow-up In an analysis of the patient-oriented composite outcome (death from any cause, any MI, or any repeat revascularization), the preventive PCI group had consistently lower incidence rates at 2 years and 7 years (log-rank P = 0.022). Conflicting responses and future directions While the PREVENT trial findings have been received with enthusiasm, they have also prompted debate and raised questions regarding the management and identification of vulnerable plaques. Some experts caution against extrapolating results, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to managing vulnerable lesions beyond focal stenting, incorporating aggressive primary prevention strategies, such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. Challenges remain regarding accurate identification of vulnerable plaques, with some experts highlighting the limitations of grayscale IVUS in detecting these lesions. Regardless, the study provides valuable insights into preventive PCI, paving the way for future research to address remaining questions and concerns. Conclusion The PREVENT trial holds significance as the first large-scale, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing preventive PCI plus OMT versus OMT alone for non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques. While offering valuable insights, further investigation is necessary to refine treatment strategies and optimize patient outcomes in the management of high-risk vulnerable plaques. Hot Topics Vulnerable Plaque Treatment 2024 Friday, April 26, 2:00 PM ~ 3:20 PM Main Arena, Level 2 Check The Session

April 25, 2024 1085

article image

TCTAP 2024

Long-term DOAC Management of AF and Stable CAD: Expectation on the EPIC-CAD Trial After the AFIRE Tr...

Gi-Byoung Nam, MD Asan Medical Center, Korea Atrial fibrillation (AF) concurrent with coronary artery disease (CAD) presents as a common clinical scenario. Approximately 30% of AF patients are reported to have CAD, with around half of them requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during their lifetime. Conversely, 5-8% of patients undergoing PCI have concurrent AF, necessitating oral anticoagulation (OAC). Managing antithrombotic therapy in AF patients undergoing PCI is complex, as anticoagulation is crucial for preventing AF-related embolic stroke, while antiplatelet therapy is essential for preventing stent thrombosis (ST). Finding a balance between ischemia prevention and bleeding risk is particularly challenging during the dynamic and unstable early post-PCI period. Traditionally, triple therapy (TT) of OAC plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been employed in recent decades. However, serious bleeding remains a significant obstacle with this approach. With the introduction of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and subsequent large randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the duration of TT has been significantly reduced, typically confined to the hospital admission period. Extended TT (up to 1 month post-discharge) is recommended only in patients with high ischemic burden and low bleeding risk. Antithrombotic management >6-12 months after PCI remains poorly understood. The incidence of ST is the highest (0.1-2.5%) in the first 30 days post-PCI and decreases over time (0.1-0.8%/year between 1-2 years). As bleeding risk remains high throughout the post-PCI period, and bleeding risk from combined anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy is hierarchical, omitting antiplatelet agents 6-12 months after PCI has been proposed. Despite their plausibility, these recommendations lack validation from studies. Recently, during 2018 and 2019, only two RCTs have been published. Optimizing Antithrombotic Care in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Stent (OAC-ALONE) trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing OAC alone with combined OAC and single antiplatelet therapy in patients with concurrent AF and stable CAD who had received coronary stents more than 1 year ago. The study was terminated prematurely due to slow patient enrollment, rendering it underpowered and inconclusive. Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial aimed to investigate whether rivaroxaban monotherapy is noninferior to combination therapy of rivaroxaban plus an antiplatelet agent in patients with AF and stable CAD who had revascularization more than 1 year ago, or those with angiographically confirmed CAD not requiring revascularization. The trial was discontinued early due to increased mortality in the combination therapy group. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was found to be noninferior for efficacy and superior for safety in patients with AF and stable CAD. Based on these trials, current guidelines recommend NOACs only for long-term anticoagulation in patients with AF and CAD. Meanwhile, for patients who require long-term anticoagulation treatment, research is still limited on the appropriate duration of combined antiplatelet therapy that can minimize the long-term risk of bleeding while also reducing ischemic events, such as ST. To provide further evidence on this issue, Gi-Byoung Nam, MD, PhD (Asan Medical Center, Korea) and his team initiated the Edoxaban vs Edoxaban With antiPlatelet Agent In Patients With AF And Chronic Stable CAD (EPIC-CAD) trial to explore optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with stable CAD and high-risk AF (Figure 1). The results of the EPIC-CAD trial are anticipated to provide additional insights into long-term antithrombotic management in these patients. Figure 1. Main flow of the EPIC-CAD Trial Hot Topics All About New Data of Antithrombotics Friday, April 26, 4:40 PM ~ 6:06 PM Presentation Room 1, Level 1 Check The Session

April 25, 2024 963

article image

TCTAP 2024

50 Years Long Journey of Coronary Physiology: From Humble To Great

As the recipient of the 14th TCTAP ¡°Master of the Masters¡± Award, Nico Pijls, MD (Catharina Hospital, the Netherlands), delivered a lecture entitled ¡°A 50-Year Journey of Coronary Physiology: From Humble Beginnings to Great Achievements.¡± The field of coronary physiology has undergone a remarkable journey over the past half-century, evolving from rudimentary understandings to sophisticated methodologies that serve as pillars in cardiovascular medicine. Historically, research on coronary flow reserve began with Gould in 1974. Thereafter, with the study of Gruntzig's coronary angiography in 1976 and the use of Kern's Doppler wire in 1990, measurement of coronary blood flow became possible. In the early 1990s, studies by Pijls and De Bruyne laid the experimental groundwork for modern coronary physiology. Their work elucidated the use of pressure-derived indices to assess severity of coronary stenosis, marking a significant departure from traditional angiographic assessments. Through meticulous experimentation, the feasibility of measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) was demonstrated to evaluate the functional significance of epicardial lesions. This provided valuable physiological insights that transcended the limitations of anatomical imaging alone. These foundational studies paved the way for the widespread adoption of FFR in coronary physiology (Figure 1). Validation of FFR as a clinical tool came to fruition through landmark trials such as the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) series. Notably, the FAME 2 trial, led by De Bruyne et al. in 2012, provided compelling evidence for the superiority of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over medical therapy alone in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). By integrating physiological assessments with routine clinical practice, FFR-guided strategies not only improved patient outcomes, but also reduced the rate of unnecessary revascularization procedures, thereby optimizing resource utilization and healthcare costs. While FFR addressed the functional significance of epicardial stenosis, elucidating microcirculatory function emerged as a critical frontier in coronary physiology. Fearon et al. (2003) introduced the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), offering clinicians a comprehensive assessment of coronary physiology beyond the epicardial vessels. By quantifying the resistance within the microcirculation, IMR provided valuable insights into microvascular health and dysfunction, thereby enabling tailored therapeutic approaches in patients with suspected microvascular angina. This paradigm shift towards a more holistic understanding of coronary physiology underscored the intricate interplay between epicardial and microvascular factors within the pathophysiology of CAD, signaling a new era in precision medicine. Innovations in coronary physiology continued to flourish with the development of adenosine-independent indices of stenosis severity. Studies by Davies (2012) introduced a novel index based on coronary wave-intensity analysis, offering a non-invasive alternative to adenosine-induced hyperemia. By leveraging intrinsic waveforms within the coronary circulation, this index provided clinicians with a robust tool for assessing the severity of lesions with enhanced accuracy and feasibility. This breakthrough not only obviated the need for adenosine administration, but also expanded the armamentarium of coronary physiology, empowering clinicians with versatile tools for tailored patient care (Figure 2). Recent advancements in measurements of absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance represent the pinnacle of progress in coronary physiology. Pijls and De bruyne (2021) elucidated the measurement of absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance using thermodilution techniques, offering clinicians unprecedented insights into coronary hemodynamics. By quantifying these parameters, clinicians were able to obtain a comprehensive understanding of coronary physiology, enabling personalized treatment strategies tailored to individual patient characteristics. This shift towards precision medicine heralds a new frontier in CAD management, where therapies are tailored not only to anatomical lesions but also to physiological nuances, thereby optimizing outcomes and enhancing patient care. The journey of coronary physiology over the past 50 years has been characterized by remarkable progress and transformative innovations. From pioneering experiments to the latest advancements, coronary physiology has evolved from a theoretical concept to a cornerstone of cardiovascular medicine. Currently, various measurements of coronary physiology provide complete and accurate description of the circulation of the heart. In the future, even further understanding of coronary physiology may be possible, through non-invasive measurements. Figure 1. Major contributions in understanding coronary physiology Figure 2. Physiological framework of coronary circulation TCTAP Award TCTAP "Master of the Masters" Award 2024 Friday, April 26, 10:10 AM ~ 10:35 AM Main Arena, Level 2 Check The Session

April 25, 2024 958

Good People, Good Memories, Good Life!
Good People, Good Memories, Good Life!